Please rotate your device to landscape mode to view the charts.

Background and Context

Research Background

Financial bubbles have become increasingly prevalent, with recent examples including Bitcoin, Chinese stock market, housing bubble, and dot-com bubble.

Research Approach

The authors conducted a systematic literature review of historical bubbles and found no coherent approach to studying them.

New Framework

The authors propose moving beyond the rationality/irrationality dichotomy toward a new "bubble triangle" framework for understanding bubble causes and consequences.

The "Bubble Triangle" Framework For Understanding Financial Bubbles

Marketability Money and Credit Speculation Spark
  • The "bubble triangle" framework identifies three necessary conditions for financial bubbles to form.
  • Marketability refers to how easily assets can be bought and sold.
  • Money and credit represent the fuel that powers bubbles through available investment funds.
  • Speculation occurs when investors purchase assets solely to generate capital gains.
  • The spark (technology or government policy) ignites the bubble when all conditions align.

Major Historical Bubbles Through The Centuries

1600s 1700s 1800s 1900s 2000s Tulipmania (1636) South Sea Bubble (1720) Railway Mania (1840s) Dotcom Bubble (2000)
  • Financial bubbles have occurred throughout history across different centuries and economic contexts.
  • The Tulipmania (1636-37) focused on tulip bulbs in the Netherlands.
  • The South Sea and Mississippi Bubbles (1720) involved company stocks and government debt schemes.
  • The Railway Mania (1840s) and Bicycle Mania (1890s) were technology-driven bubbles.
  • Recent bubbles include the Dotcom Bubble (2000) and Housing Bubble (2008).

How Bubbles Start: Political vs. Technological Sparks

Technology Sparks Political Sparks Bicycle Mania - New Transportation Dotcom Bubble - Internet Tech Roaring 20s - Mass Production South Sea - Government Debt Relief Japanese Bubble - Monetary Policy Housing Bubble - Homeownership Policies
  • Bubbles are sparked by either technological innovation or government policy changes.
  • Technology sparks create initial excitement about new innovations and potential future profits.
  • Political sparks often involve intentional policy decisions that cause asset prices to rise.
  • Technology-sparked bubbles like Bicycle Mania or Dotcom have often left lasting innovations.
  • Politically-sparked bubbles like the South Sea Bubble were often designed to address government problems.

Destructive vs. Beneficial Bubbles: The Role of Leverage

Destructive Bubbles Beneficial Bubbles Political Spark + Bank Leverage Banking System Exposure Credit-Fueled Speculation Technology Spark + Low Leverage Infrastructure Development Innovation Legacy Examples: Mississippi Bubble Australian Land Boom Examples: Railway Mania Bicycle Mania
  • Not all bubbles are equally destructive; some can leave beneficial technological or infrastructure legacies.
  • Most destructive bubbles combine political sparks with extensive bank leverage and credit-fueled speculation.
  • The Mississippi Bubble and Australian Land Boom caused banking crises and severe economic damage.
  • Beneficial bubbles typically involve technological innovation with limited leverage or banking system exposure.
  • The Railway Mania left Britain with a national rail network; the Bicycle Mania advanced transportation technology.

How Business Historians Can Contribute to Understanding Bubbles

Business Historians Discover Lesser Known Bubbles Bridge Quantitative & Historical Contexts Explain Links Between Bubbles and Fraud Examine Institutional Effects of Bubbles
  • Business historians can discover and explain lesser-known bubble episodes from regions outside major industrial nations.
  • They can bridge quantitative economic studies with rich historical, technological, and political contexts.
  • Business historians can explore the relationship between financial bubbles and fraud or white-collar crime.
  • They can examine how bubbles reshape political, legal, financial, and corporate institutions over time.
  • A multidisciplinary approach integrating historical and economic methodologies improves understanding of bubble dynamics.

Contribution and Implications

  • The "bubble triangle" framework offers a more useful approach than the traditional rationality/irrationality dichotomy.
  • Understanding the spark type (technological vs. political) helps predict whether bubbles will be destructive or beneficial.
  • The level and type of leverage (bank vs. capital market) is crucial for determining bubble consequences.
  • Bubbles with political sparks and bank leverage tend to create the most severe economic damage.
  • Some bubbles leave positive legacies through technological innovation, infrastructure, or improved financial architecture.

Data Sources

  • The "Bubble Triangle" visualization is based on the framework proposed in Section 3 of the article.
  • Historical Bubbles Timeline visualization draws from Table 1, which lists historical episodes identified as bubbles.
  • Bubble Spark Types visualization is derived from Section 3's discussion of technological and political sparks.
  • Destructive vs. Beneficial Bubbles visualization is based on Section 4 and Figure 1 from the article.
  • Business Historians' Contributions visualization is based on Section 5's conclusion about future research directions.